Volume: 4 | Issue: 1 | View as PDF | Cite
  • OPEN ACCESS

Biomarkers in Congenital Heart Disease: Current Evidence and Future Directions

  • Shadab Ahamad1,2,* 
 Author information
Nature Cell and Science   2026;4(1):e00037

doi: 10.61474/ncs.2025.00037

Abstract

Congenital heart diseases (CHDs) are the most prevalent congenital anomalies worldwide and are a leading cause of infant morbidity and mortality, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Despite advances in fetal imaging and pediatric cardiac care, most CHDs are diagnosed only after structural defects have formed, limiting opportunities for prevention. This narrative review synthesizes evidence on established and emerging biomarkers for early detection, risk stratification, and prevention of CHD. Studies published between 2000 and 2025 in PubMed were reviewed, focusing on metabolic, nutritional, immunological, molecular, and imaging biomarkers from maternal, fetal, and postnatal contexts. Advances in omics technologies—including metabolomics, proteomics, transcriptomics, and epigenomics—have revealed alterations in pathways related to one-carbon metabolism, oxidative stress, lipid metabolism, hypoxia signaling, immune regulation, and chromatin remodeling in CHD-affected pregnancies and patients. Biomarkers such as homocysteine, acylcarnitines, branched-chain amino acids, natriuretic peptides, inflammatory cytokines, microRNAs, and epigenetic regulators show potential for reflecting early pathogenic processes and disease severity. However, heterogeneity across studies and limited longitudinal validation currently restrict clinical translation. Overall, evidence supports a multimodal biomarker approach integrated with imaging and clinical assessment, with early risk identification during the periconceptional and early gestational periods offering the greatest opportunity to reduce the global burden of CHD.

Keywords

Congenital heart disease, Biomarkers, Maternal-fetal interface, Periconceptional period, Preventive cardiology, Prognostics

Introduction

Congenital heart diseases (CHDs) are the most common congenital anomalies worldwide, accounting for nearly 28% of all birth defects. The global incidence is estimated at approximately 9 per 1,000 live births, translating to about 1.35 million affected newborns annually, including ∼240,000 cases in India.1 Owing to their clinical heterogeneity, complex etiological architecture, and substantial contribution to infant morbidity and mortality, CHDs represent a major public health burden, particularly in low- and middle-income countries.2

CHDs encompass a broad anatomical and physiological spectrum. Acyanotic lesions include ventricular septal defect, atrial septal defect, patent ductus arteriosus, and obstructive lesions such as pulmonary stenosis, aortic stenosis, and coarctation of the aorta. Cyanotic defects include tetralogy of Fallot, tricuspid atresia, truncus arteriosus, and transposition of the great arteries.3 Disease severity ranges from simple defects that may resolve spontaneously to complex malformations requiring staged surgical interventions and lifelong surveillance.4

Despite advances in pediatric cardiac surgery and catheter-based therapies, CHDs remain a leading cause of infant mortality, with up to 18–25% of affected infants dying within the first year of life, particularly in resource-limited settings.2,5 Survivors often face long-term complications, including neurodevelopmental impairment, growth restriction, recurrent hospitalizations, and psychosocial challenges, imposing sustained healthcare and socioeconomic burdens.6

The etiology of CHD is multifactorial and incompletely elucidated. Genetic variants, epigenetic dysregulation, and environmental exposures collectively contribute to disease risk, yet these factors explain only a subset of cases and may vary across populations.7–9 Increasing evidence underscores the importance of the maternal intrauterine environment during early gestation, particularly the first 6–8 weeks when cardiogenesis occurs.10 Disruptions in key transcription factors (e.g., NKX2-5, GATA4), developmental signaling pathways (Notch, Wnt/β-catenin), chromatin-remodeling complexes, and cilia-related genes have been implicated in abnormal cardiac morphogenesis.7 Currently, CHD diagnosis largely occurs after structural abnormalities have developed. Prenatal detection through fetal echocardiography has improved considerably, with sensitivities ranging from approximately 70–90%, while postnatal screening tools such as pulse oximetry help identify 80% of critical CHDs, and chest radiography demonstrates diagnostic accuracy ranging from 60–80%.11–13 Advanced imaging modalities, including cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT), provide valuable anatomical detail but remain costly and limited in accessibility.14 However, these approaches primarily detect established anatomical defects, highlighting the need for strategies that identify early biological disturbances preceding structural malformations.

In this context, biomarkers have emerged as promising tools for early detection, risk stratification, and potential prevention of CHDs. Biomarkers are measurable indicators of biological processes and ideally should be non-invasive, reproducible, cost-effective, and demonstrate high sensitivity and specificity.15 Advances in omics-based technologies, including metabolomics, proteomics, transcriptomics, and epigenomics, have expanded the CHD biomarker landscape. Studies have reported alterations in maternal metabolites such as homocysteine, branched-chain amino acids, phosphatidylcholines, and acylcarnitines, reflecting disruptions in one-carbon metabolism, oxidative stress, and energy pathways. Proteomic analyses of maternal plasma have also identified dysregulated proteins related to extracellular matrix organization, immune signaling, and myocardial structure that may distinguish CHD pregnancies from unaffected controls.16

Accordingly, this narrative review provides evidence (2000–2025) from PubMed on established and emerging biomarkers in CHD, with emphasis on their potential roles in early diagnosis, risk prediction, and prevention, while highlighting current translational challenges and future research priorities.

Biological indicators of congenital heart defects

Preconceptional health plays a crucial role in shaping maternal physiological adaptation and fetal developmental outcomes, including the risk of CHD.17 Factors such as maternal age, body mass index, interpregnancy interval, micronutrient sufficiency, and iron status influence early embryonic development.18 Epidemiological studies report a higher incidence of congenital anomalies—including cardiovascular defects—among teenage pregnancies, particularly in mothers ≤19 years, likely due to biological immaturity, suboptimal nutrition, and limited antenatal care.19,20

Maternal nutritional status is a key modifiable determinant of fetal health. Optimization of nutrition prior to conception reduces adverse outcomes such as preterm birth, intrauterine growth restriction, low birth weight, and congenital anomalies.21 Anemia affects over 500 million women of reproductive age (15–45 years) globally, predominantly due to iron deficiency.22 Iron deficiency during early gestation impairs oxygen transport and exacerbates fetal hypoxia, a recognized disruptor of normal cardiogenesis.23

Emerging evidence also highlights paternal contributions to CHD risk. Advanced paternal age has been associated with an increased risk of patent ductus arteriosus in offspring,24 potentially mediated by telomere shortening, accumulation of de novo mutations, and epigenetic instability in sperm.25 Paternal exposures to smoking, alcohol, and environmental toxins before conception may further increase CHD risk through oxidative stress, hormonal dysregulation, genomic instability, and epigenetic alterations.26

Metabolomic studies have identified early biochemical disturbances associated with CHD. Elevated maternal levels of acylcarnitine, ethanol, and acetone reflect impaired fatty acid oxidation and altered energy metabolism during early pregnancy.27 Differential levels of metabolites such as valine, glucose, glutamine, creatinine, and polyunsaturated fatty acids have also been reported in CHD-affected pregnancies.28 Urinary metabolomic profiling highlights methionine as a significantly altered metabolite, implicating disturbances in one-carbon metabolism.29

Additional metabolite signatures—including 4-hydroxybenzeneacetic acid, 5-trimethylsilyloxy-n-valeric acid, propanedioic acid, hydracrylic acid, and uric acid—derived from short-chain fatty acids and aromatic amino acid pathways have been associated with CHD risk.16 Pathway analyses further indicate disruptions in aldosterone synthesis, nicotinate and nicotinamide metabolism, and drug metabolism pathways.30

Metabolic biomarkers

Metabolic biomarkers encompass biochemical indicators reflecting myocardial injury, hemodynamic stress, and systemic metabolite alterations. Early studies focused on cardiomyocyte injury markers such as myoglobin, cardiac troponins, lactate dehydrogenase, and creatine phosphokinase.31 Although clinically relevant, these markers typically rise only after myocardial damage has occurred.

Subsequent research emphasized biomarkers of cardiac stress and inflammation. B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal pro-BNP correlate with heart failure severity and ventricular function.32,33 Inflammatory markers such as high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, interferon-γ, interleukins-6 and 10, tumor necrosis factor-α, and soluble Fas have been implicated in systemic inflammation and vascular dysfunction in pediatric CHD.34 In addition, elevated maternal apolipoprotein A1 and triglyceride levels during early pregnancy are associated with increased odds of CHD in offspring.35

Recent studies highlight low-molecular-weight biomarkers capable of detecting pathological changes. Circulating microRNAs have emerged as promising candidates due to their stability, tissue specificity, and regulatory role in cardiac development and remodeling.36 Blood-derived biomarkers are minimally invasive and provide quantitative measures of early disease processes, complementing imaging-based diagnostics.37

Hypoxia-related metabolic pathways also contribute to CHD pathogenesis.38 Increased expression of vascular endothelial growth factor, hypoxia-inducible factor-1α, and superoxide dismutase-1 has been observed in CHD fetuses, reflecting adaptive responses to intrauterine hypoxia and their roles in outflow tract remodeling and coronary vasculogenesis.39–41 Cardioprotective proteins, including heat shock protein-70, protein kinase C-ε, and endothelial nitric oxide synthase, are essential for myocardial resilience; their dysregulation may predispose the developing heart to ischemia-reperfusion injury later in life.42

Maternal metabolic and nutritional biomarkers

Maternal conditions such as infection, substance use, environmental pollution, anemia, hemoglobinopathies, abnormal placentation, pre-eclampsia, and umbilical cord compression can exacerbate fetal hypoxia and disrupt normal cardiac development.43 Population-based studies report a significant association between maternal anemia and increased CHD incidence.44

Maternal serum, urine, and amniotic fluid represent key biological matrices for biomarker discovery. Altered levels of acylcarnitine, sphingomyelins, and other lipid metabolites have been observed in CHD pregnancies.45 Maternal dyslipidemia, characterized by elevated apolipoproteins A1 and B, triglycerides, and cholesterol fractions, has also been associated with increased CHD risk in offspring.35 Urinary metabolomic analyses have identified 23 altered metabolites, with methionine showing the most pronounced change.46

Micronutrient status is another critical determinant. Elevated maternal homocysteine levels, reflecting impaired folate and vitamin B12 metabolism, have been consistently associated with pregnancies affected by CHD.47,48

Immunological biomarkers

Immunological dysregulation contributes to CHD pathophysiology. Reduced granulocyte activity, altered complement levels, and impaired T- and B-cell function have been reported in association with structural cardiac defects. Alterations in immunoglobulin levels (IgA and IgG) and increased suppressor T-cell activity are particularly evident in syndromic CHDs.49

Chronic inflammation may also influence disease progression. Elevated levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and interferon-γ have been reported in patients with Eisenmenger syndrome.50 Children with CHD frequently exhibit increased susceptibility to infections and impaired cellular immunity, particularly following bronchopneumonia.51

Integrated metabolomic-immunologic analyses have demonstrated correlations between metabolites—including 3-D-hydroxybutyrate, acetone, acetoacetate, citrate, lactate, creatine, creatinine, and alanine—and disease severity as well as postoperative outcomes, aligning with clinical indices such as the risk adjustment for congenital heart surgery (RACHS) scores, pediatric organ dysfunction scores, and intensive care unit (ICU)-free days.52

Molecular biomarkers

Genetic and epigenetic factors play a major role in CHD etiology. Single-gene disorders, chromosomal abnormalities, and copy number variations account for nearly 40% of cases,7 while genetic contributions may be implicated in up to 90% of CHD overall.53

Whole-exome sequencing studies have identified de novo mutations in genes involved in chromatin remodeling, transcriptional regulation, and cardiac morphogenesis, including HSP90AA1, ROCK2, IQGAP1, and CHD4, many of which are also linked to neurodevelopmental impairment.54,55 Epigenetic investigations have revealed differential DNA methylation patterns and dysregulated microRNAs associated with abnormal cardiogenesis. High rates of de novo mutations in histone-modifying genes further highlight the role of epigenetic dysregulation in CHD pathogenesis.56

Imaging biomarkers

Non-invasive imaging has transformed CHD diagnosis and management. Transthoracic echocardiography remains the cornerstone of evaluation due to its availability, portability, and diagnostic accuracy, while cardiac CT and MRI provide complementary anatomical and functional insights in complex lesions.57

Fetal echocardiography is the most effective modality for prenatal CHD detection. The transition from basic four-chamber views to extended protocols incorporating outflow tract and three-vessel trachea views has significantly improved diagnostic yield. Despite high specificity (up to 99.9%), sensitivity remains moderate and operator-dependent, with diagnostic discrepancies reported in approximately 13.5% of cases.58,59 Nonetheless, fetal echocardiography remains indispensable for early detection and timely intervention.

Biomarkers for CHD: A clinical update

Over the past two decades, substantial advances have improved the understanding, diagnosis, and management of pediatric CHDs. Nevertheless, CHDs remain clinically challenging due to their marked anatomical heterogeneity, lesion-specific hemodynamics, and long-term morbidity. Abnormal pressure and volume loading, cyanosis, and pulmonary hypertension trigger complex biological cascades involving neurohormonal activation, inflammatory cytokine release, fibroblast proliferation, and endothelial dysfunction. These processes drive maladaptive cardiac remodeling, myocardial hypertrophy, thrombosis, cellular injury, and cardiomyocyte death, ultimately influencing disease progression and outcomes.32

The clinical utility of a biomarker in CHD lies in its ability to reflect underlying pathophysiological processes and predict clinically meaningful endpoints. In CHD, no single biomarker can capture the diverse mechanisms underlying different phenotypes, age groups, and disease stages.60 Biomarkers therefore function primarily as surrogate indicators of specific biological processes rather than standalone diagnostic tools. Circulating cytokines, chemokines, adipocytokines, soluble receptors, and other immune activation markers have thus gained attention as indicators of myocardial stress, inflammation, and remodeling.61 However, robust prognostication in pediatric CHD remains limited by heterogeneous study designs, small cohorts, and a lack of long-term longitudinal datasets.

Among cardiac biomarkers, BNP and soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 (ST2) are increasingly used for diagnosis, monitoring, and outcome prediction in pediatric heart disease.32,62,63 These markers reflect myocardial wall stress, fibrosis, and adverse remodeling—central features of CHD pathophysiology. Their interpretation in children, however, must consider age-dependent physiological variability and lesion-specific hemodynamics.64

Biomarkers are also valuable for understanding disease biology and identifying potential therapeutic targets. Risk factors such as obesity, alcohol consumption, smoking, and substance abuse have been consistently associated with increased CHD risk, likely mediated through metabolic dysregulation, oxidative stress, and epigenetic modification.9,65 Accordingly, biomarkers reflecting parental metabolic, nutritional, and reproductive health have emerged as an important area of investigation (Tables 1 and 2).3,16,27,28,32–34,51,66–86

Table 1

Predictive biomarkers in congenital heart disease

Biomarker categoryRegionParticipantsSample sizeType of sampleAssessed biomarkersMethodologyFindingsReference
Genetic and molecular biomarkerAsianPregnant mothers (22–42 years) of gestational age (25–31 weeks)n = 602 casesAmniotic fluidSingle nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)Chromosomal microarray analysisPathogenic chromosomal abnormalities were detected in 48.9% of CHD casesWang et al.66
North-central ChineseChildren (4–7 years)n = 30 cases; n = 30 controlsCardiac tissuemiR-145, miR-182, and FXN (frataxin)Gene expression microarray, and RT-qPCRAltered expression of FXN due to binding of miR-145 at the 3′ UTR region was confirmed and may regulate the development of CHDWang et al.67
West ChineseMothers (<28 years) of gestational ages (24–25 weeks)n = 27 cases; n = 27 controlsSerummiR-19b, miR-22, miR-29c, and miR-375mirVana PARIS Kit, SOLiD sequencing, and qRT-PCRAll markers were significantly upregulated, and were more efficient, when combined, for prenatal detection of fetal CHD (AUC = 0.813)Zhu et al.68
Han ChineseChildren (26 months) and Mothers (20–35 years)n = 201 cases; n = 201 controlsPlacenta tissues and umbilical cordsABCB1 gene C3435T polymorphism, and maternal periconceptional toxicantsGenotyping/sequencing, cDNA synthesis, and western blottingABCB1 mRNA expression was significantly higher in the TT genotype than in the CC genotype. Fetal C3435T polymorphism increased the risk of CHD when mothers were exposed to phthalates and alkylphenolic compoundsWang et al.69
Maternal biomarkerUSA (Hispanic and non-Hispanic)Liveborn infants and their mothersn = 569 familiesBuccal cell swabsRFC1, MGMT, and GSTA3 genesIllumina Golden Gate Custom SNP genotyping, whole genome amplification, and TaqMan RNase AssayFour SNPs (rs6812588, rs1762430, rs9296695, and rs4712023) identified in genes RFC1, MGMT, and GSTA3 are involved in DNA methylation, cellular defense, and DNA replicationPatel et al.70
Eastern ChineseMothers (23–34 years)n = 71 cases; n = 149 controlsAmniotic fluidUric acidGas chromatography/time-of-flight-mass spectrometry (GC-TOF/MS)Elevated uric acid levels (P < 0.001) in amniotic fluid may serve as a potential biomarker for CHDLi et al.71
Central-coast ChineseMothers (20–43 years)n = 230 cases; n = 381 controlsBloodTriglyceride, apolipoprotein-A1, and apolipoprotein-BLipid multivariate analysisMaternal Apo-A1 levels were significantly higher in CHD cases (P = 0.02), whereas Apo-B levels were not significant (P = 0.27)Cao et al.32
Shaanxi ChineseMothers (≥ 30 years)n = 474 cases; n = 948 controlsDietary pattern analysisExtrinsic factors: alcohol, smoking, lower iron dose, medication, and folate supplementsGlobal Diet Quality Score (GDQS), and Mediterranean Diet Score (MDS)Maternal GDQS and MDS demonstrated good predictive value for fetal CHD (AUC ≈ 0.8), and were inversely associated with CHDYang et al.72
Southwestern ChineseMothers (<30 years)n = 70 cases; n = 70 controlsUrine4-hydroxybenzeneacetic acid, 5-trimethylsilyloxy-n-valeric acid, propanedioic acid, hydracrylic acid, and uric acidGC-MS, Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney testDuring the second and third trimesters, short-chain fatty acids and aromatic amino acid metabolism may be associated with CHDXie et al.16
Northwestern PortugalNewborns (Gestational ages: 37–40 weeks)n = 34 cases; n = 20 controlsUmbilical cord blood and plasmaTroponin I, myoglobin, and creatine kinase-MB mass (CK-MB)Architect i2000 automated analyzerTroponin I and myoglobin levels were similar between newborn groups; however, variations in plasma CK-MB levels were identified as marker for surgeryNeves et al.3
Caucasian, African American, AsianMothers (<30 years)n = 27 cases; n = 59 controlsSerumC3-OH (hydroxypropionyl carnitine), C5:1-DC (glutaconyl carnitine), C14:2-OH (hydroxytetradecadienyl carnitine)MS, and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopyDuring the first trimester, these metabolites showed significant elevation of acylcarnitines, with a sensitivity and specificity of 67.9% and 67.8%, respectivelyBahado-Singh et al.27
Dutch native, Western immigrant, Non-Western immigrant (Netherlands)Mothers (24–41 years)n = 261 cases; n = 325 controlsBloodApolipoprotein B, homocysteine, and triglyceridesImmunoturbidometric assay, liquid chromatography, and Cobas Mira auto analyzerApolipoprotein B levels above 85.0 mg/dL were strongly associated an increased CHD riskSmedts et al.73
Table 2

Diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in congenital heart disease

Biomarker categoryRegionParticipantsSample sizeType of sampleAssessed biomarkersMethodologyFindingsReference
Diagnostic biomarker
Metabolic biomarkerNorth IndianChildren (0–20 years)n = 35 cases; n = 15 controlsSerumGlucose, valine, acetone, glutamine, creatinine, and PUFAHigh-resolution 1D 1H CPMG, and NMR spectroscopyPatients with CHD showed a significantly decreased concentration of glutamate/glutamine (P < 0.01)Vimal et al.28
JapaneseChildren (mean age = 11 years), adults (mean age = 24 years)n = 197 children as cases; n = 102 adults as controlsSerumUric acidClinical, laboratory variables, and Kaplan-Meier survival curvesElevated uric acid levels are associated with increased cardiovascular risk (P < 0.001)Ohuchi et al.74
Northern UKChildren (4–18.9 months)n = 28 cases; n = 15 controlsBlood3-D-hydroxybutyrate, acetone, acetoacetate, citrate, lactate, creatine, creatinine, and alanineNMR SpectroscopyMetabolites were directly associated with surgical and CHD severityCorreia et al.75
Immunological biomarkerChinesePatients (4–65 years)n = 28 cases; n = 6 controlsSerumWhole proteome spectrumMS, immunohistochemistry, and Western blottingExpression of filamin A, caveolin and glutathione S-transferase M1 was significantly decreased in the irreversible CHD-pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) group (P < 0.05)Huang et al.51
Ankara TurkeyChildren (<17 years)n = 50 cases; n = 20 controlsPlasmaIntercellular adhesion molecules-1 (ICAM-1)Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) assayIncreased serum levels of VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 (P = 0.002) were observed and may serve as markers of endothelium dysfunction and damage associated with CHDOguz et al.76
EgyptianChildren (<4 years)n = 120 cases; n = 30 controlsSerumTumor necrosis factor (TNF-a), interleukin-6 (IL-6), C-reactive protein (CRP), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), troponin T, CK-MB, and caspase 3ELISA assayLevel of IL-6, CRP, TNF-alpha were significantly increased in cyanotic CHD as compared with acyanotic CHDNassef, et al.77
Cardiac biomarkerSouthern SwedishNeonatesn = 34 cases; n = 81 controlsBloodN-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP)NT-proBNP assayNT-proBNP testing alone identified 71% of all CHD and 68% of critical CHD (AUC = 0.96, P < 0.05)Clausen et al.78
Northwestern JapanChildren (>3 years)n = 59 casesBloodTroponin, amino-terminal procollagen type III peptide (PIIIP), and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP)/NT-proBNPNT-proBNP assayBNP and NT-proBNP levels showed a strong correlation with myocardial damage and heart failure severity. In atrial and ventricular septal defects, highly sensitive troponin I and PIIIP levels were elevated (P < 0.01)Sugimoto et al.34
JapaneseChildren (<10 years)n = 163 cases; n = 42 controlsSerumPIIIPImmuno-radiometry, (IRMA) kitPIIIP levels were significantly elevated in CHD patients (P < 0.001)Sugimoto et al.79
Imaging biomarkerNorth IndianChildren-Organ examinationImaging analysis2D, and 3D echo-cardiographyEchocardiography is a non-invasive tool for assessing the structural and functional characteristics of the heartTomar et al.80
FranceChildren-Organ examinationImaging analysisCardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI), computed tomography (CT) scanAdvanced imaging screening improved patient life expectancy and lifestyle outcomesDacher et al.81
USANewborns-Oxygen level examinationOxygen saturation analysisPulse oximetryInfants with positive pulse oximetry screening results should undergo diagnostic echocardiographyHarold et al.82
Prognostic biomarker
Prognostic biomarkerEastern ChineseChildren (mean age = 6 years)n = 65 cases; n = 17 deceased cases used as controlsBloodB7-H3 (CD276)ELISAHigher serum levels of B7-H3 (P < 0.001) were significantly associated with major cardiovascular events (heart muscle disease and arrhythmias), and increased mortality in CHD patientsZhang et al.83
NetherlandsAdultsn = 59 cases; n = 12 deceased cases used as controlsBloodCystatin CElectrochemiluminescence immunoassay (Elecsys 2010 analyzer)Elevated cystatin C levels (P < 0.001) predicted long-term mortality and adverse clinical events in PAH-CHD patientsBlok et al.84
SpainChildren (<14 years)n = 40 casesPlasmaNT-proBNPElectrocardiogram, chest X-ray, NYHA scale, and 2D-SSFP sequenceIn surgically corrected tetralogy of Fallot patients, NT-proBNP levels were associated with right ventricular dilatationValverde et al.85
ChineseChildren (1 month–18 years)n = 77 cases; n = 81 controlsPlasmaVitamin B12, homocysteine, and hydrogen sulfideFluorescence polarization immunoassay, ELISA, and radio-immunoassaysElevated homocysteine levels and reduced hydrogen sulfide levels (P < 0.001) were negatively correlated in PAH associated with CHD, suggesting a role in prognosis and quality of life outcomesSun et al.86
GermanyChildren (mean age = 6 years)n = 288 cases; n = 152 controlsVenous bloodBNPSandwich immunoassay (Triage BNP assay)Normal BNP levels cannot exclude cardiac pathology but may reflect a compensated cardiac conditionKoch et al.33

Hemodynamic assessment through echocardiography, cardiac MRI, and cardiac catheterization remains the cornerstone of CHD evaluation. Circulating biomarkers increasingly complement these modalities. Since the discovery of natriuretic peptides by de Bold in the 1970s, BNP has been extensively studied as a marker of volume overload and myocardial stress across cardiac and non-cardiac conditions.87 In non-pregnant populations, BNP reliably predicts adverse cardiovascular outcomes.88 During pregnancy, although echocardiography provides valuable structural and functional information, it cannot fully capture maternal cardiovascular adaptation or early fetal stress. Circulating cardiovascular biomarkers may therefore enhance early risk stratification when combined with imaging.

Maternal health before and during pregnancy plays a decisive role in fetal cardiac development. The placenta functions as the primary interface for oxygen, nutrient, and metabolic exchange during gestation.89 Periconceptional deficiencies of folic acid, ferritin, vitamin B12, and vitamin D represent modifiable risk factors associated with congenital anomalies.90 Diets high in fat and animal protein during early conception may increase oxidative stress in the follicular environment, impair oocyte quality, and contribute to gestational diabetes mellitus, an established risk factor for CHD.91 Maternal anemia further exacerbates fetal hypoxia, disrupting embryogenesis and increasing susceptibility to both congenital and later-life cardiovascular disease.23,92

Cardiac morphogenesis is largely completed by the eighth week of gestation, underscoring the importance of very early biomarker assessment.93 Physiological hypoxia is a normal feature of embryonic development and regulates differentiation through hypoxia-inducible signaling pathways. However, excessive or prolonged hypoxia disrupts these finely tuned processes and contributes to abnormal cardiogenesis. Biomarkers reflecting hypoxic stress, oxidative imbalance, and metabolic dysregulation may therefore provide predictive signals well before anatomical defects become detectable by imaging.94

Current clinical detection strategies remain largely imaging-based. Structural cardiac anomalies are typically detected after 20 weeks of gestation using fetal echocardiography,95 which identifies approximately 68.5–90% of simple and complex CHDs in expert hands, although diagnostic discrepancies persist, particularly for complex lesions and in the presence of maternal comorbidities.59 Invasive procedures such as amniocentesis carry procedural risks and are unsuitable for population-level screening, reinforcing the need for non-invasive biomarker-based approaches.96

Postnatally, several biochemical and immunological biomarkers, including C-reactive protein, interleukins, interferon-γ, CK-MB, myoglobin, and BNP, have demonstrated diagnostic and prognostic relevance in CHD.49,97 Biomarkers also show promise in predicting postoperative outcomes following congenital heart surgery.98 Limited evidence suggests that markers such as galectin-3, ST2, NT-proBNP, and glial fibrillary acidic protein improve prediction of unplanned readmission and mortality when combined with clinical risk models.99,100 Nonetheless, these findings require validation in larger, multicenter cohorts before routine clinical implementation.

Conclusions

Although substantial progress has been made in identifying biomarkers associated with CHD, the search for an ideal biomarker that is feasible, reproducible, cost-effective, and clinically actionable remains ongoing. Current evidence supports a multimodal approach integrating metabolic, molecular, immunological, and imaging biomarkers rather than reliance on a single indicator. Early identification of risk, particularly during the periconceptional and early gestational periods, holds the greatest promise for reducing the global burden of CHD. Continued advances in omics technologies, coupled with well-designed longitudinal studies, are likely to accelerate the translation of biomarker research into effective prevention, diagnosis, and personalized management strategies for CHD.

Declarations

Acknowledgement

The author would like to acknowledge Sri Sathya Sai Sanjeevani Research Centre, Haryana (India), for providing research facilities.

Funding

None.

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Authors’ contributions

SA is the sole author of the manuscript.

References

  1. Saxena A. Congenital Heart Disease in India: A Status Report. Indian Pediatr 2018;55(12):1075-1082 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  2. Xu J, Li Q, Deng L, Xiong J, Cheng Z, Ye C. Global, regional, and national epidemiology of congenital heart disease in children from 1990 to 2021. Front Cardiovasc Med 2025;12:1522644 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  3. Neves AL, Cabral M, Leite-Moreira A, Monterroso J, Ramalho C, Guimarães H, et al. Myocardial Injury Biomarkers in Newborns with Congenital Heart Disease. Pediatr Neonatol 2016;57(6):488-495 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  4. Meng X, Song M, Zhang K, Lu W, Li Y, Zhang C, et al. Congenital heart disease: types, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment options. MedComm (2020) 2024;5(7):e631 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  5. Rohit M, Shrivastava S. Acyanotic and Cyanotic Congenital Heart Diseases. Indian J Pediatr 2018;85(6):454-460 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  6. Shahmansouri N, Kamali A, Dehbozorgi S, Delpak A, Mirzaaghayan MR, Dehghani S, et al. Disease Burden in Caregivers of Children with Congenital Heart Disease in Children’s Medical Center, Tehran, Iran. J Iran Med Counc 2023;6(1):45-51 View Article
  7. Yasuhara J, Garg V. Genetics of congenital heart disease: a narrative review of recent advances and clinical implications. Transl Pediatr 2021;10(9):2366-2386 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  8. Linglart L, Bonnet D. Epigenetics and Congenital Heart Diseases. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis 2022;9(6):185 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  9. Zhang TN, Wu QJ, Liu YS, Lv JL, Sun H, Chang Q, et al. Environmental Risk Factors and Congenital Heart Disease: An Umbrella Review of 165 Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses With More Than 120 Million Participants. Front Cardiovasc Med 2021;8:640729 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  10. Tan CMJ, Lewandowski AJ. The Transitional Heart: From Early Embryonic and Fetal Development to Neonatal Life. Fetal Diagn Ther 2020;47(5):373-386 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  11. Yuan X, Liu Z, Zhu J, Yu P, Deng Y, Chen X, et al. Association between prepregnancy body mass index and risk of congenital heart defects in offspring: an ambispective observational study in China. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2020;20(1):444 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  12. Zeng Z, Zhang H, Liu F, Zhang N. Current diagnosis and treatments for critical congenital heart defects. Exp Ther Med 2016;11(5):1550-1554 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  13. Rakha S, El Marsafawy H. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of fetal echocardiography for high-risk pregnancies in a tertiary center in Egypt. Arch Pediatr 2019;26(6):337-341 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  14. Negussie M, Sanchez N, Sidiq SA, Trvalik A, Baettig E, Ozkok S, et al. Applying artificial intelligence to cardiac MRI to diagnose congenital heart disease in low-resource settings such as Sub-Saharan Africa. Commun Med (Lond) 2025;5(1):473 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  15. Ahmad A, Imran M, Ahsan H. Biomarkers as Biomedical Bioindicators: Approaches and Techniques for the Detection, Analysis, and Validation of Novel Biomarkers of Diseases. Pharmaceutics 2023;15(6):1630 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  16. Xie D, Luo Y, Xiong X, Lou M, Liu Z, Wang A, et al. Study on the Potential Biomarkers of Maternal Urine Metabolomics for Fetus with Congenital Heart Diseases Based on Modified Gas Chromatograph-Mass Spectrometer. Biomed Res Int 2019;2019:1905416 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  17. Lim TB, Foo SYR, Chen CK. The Role of Epigenetics in Congenital Heart Disease. Genes (Basel) 2021;12(3):390 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  18. King JC. A Summary of Pathways or Mechanisms Linking Preconception Maternal Nutrition with Birth Outcomes. J Nutr 2016;146(7):1437S-1444S View Article PubMed/NCBI
  19. Chen X, Lou H, Chen L, Muhuza MPU, Chen D, Zhang X. Epidemiology of birth defects in teenage pregnancies: Based on provincial surveillance system in eastern China. Front Public Health 2022;10:1008028 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  20. Csermely G, Susánszky É, Czeizel AE. Association of young and advanced age of pregnant women with the risk of isolated congenital abnormalities in Hungary - a population-based case-matched control study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2015;28(4):436-442 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  21. Salatas C, Bronnert A, Lawrence R, Alexander T, Wall C, Bloomfield FH, et al. Dietary Patterns and Diet Quality before and/or during Pregnancy and How These Affect Birth Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Adv Nutr 2025;16(10):100490 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  22. De-Regil LM, Harding KB, Roche ML. Preconceptional Nutrition Interventions for Adolescent Girls and Adult Women: Global Guidelines and Gaps in Evidence and Policy with Emphasis on Micronutrients. J Nutr 2016;146(7):1461S-1470S View Article PubMed/NCBI
  23. Qaddour R, Alsayed R. Relationship between maternal iron status and the risk of congenital heart defects: A case-control study. J Int Med Res 2025;53(7):3000605251356004 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  24. Su XJ, Yuan W, Huang GY, Olsen J, Li J. Paternal age and offspring congenital heart defects: a national cohort study. PLoS One 2015;10(3):e0121030 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  25. Fumagalli M, Rossiello F, Clerici M, Barozzi S, Cittaro D, Kaplunov JM, et al. Telomeric DNA damage is irreparable and causes persistent DNA-damage-response activation. Nat Cell Biol 2012;14(4):355-365 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  26. Bruner-Tran KL, Mokshagundam S, Barlow A, Ding T, Osteen KG. Paternal Environmental Toxicant Exposure and Risk of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes. Curr Obstet Gynecol Rep 2019;8(3):103-113 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  27. Bahado-Singh RO, Ertl R, Mandal R, Bjorndahl TC, Syngelaki A, Han B, et al. Metabolomic prediction of fetal congenital heart defect in the first trimester. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014;211(3):240.e1-240.e14 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  28. Vimal S, Ranjan R, Yadav S, Majumdar G, Mittal B, Sinha N, et al. Serum metabolomics profiling to identify novel biomarkers for cyanotic heart disease. Biomed Pharmacol J 2021;14(1):81-94 View Article
  29. Friedman P, Yilmaz A, Ugur Z, Jafar F, Whitten A, Ustun I, et al. Urine metabolomic biomarkers for prediction of isolated fetal congenital heart defect. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2022;35(25):6380-6387 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  30. Yuan X, Li L, Kang H, Wang M, Zeng J, Lei Y, et al. Biomarkers for isolated congenital heart disease based on maternal amniotic fluid metabolomics analysis. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2022;22(1):495 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  31. Brown JR, Stabler ME, Parker DM, Vricella L, Pasquali S, Leyenaar JK, et al. Biomarkers improve prediction of 30-day unplanned readmission or mortality after paediatric congenital heart surgery. Cardiol Young 2019;29(8):1051-1056 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  32. Sugimoto M, Kuwata S, Kurishima C, Kim JH, Iwamoto Y, Senzaki H. Cardiac biomarkers in children with congenital heart disease. World J Pediatr 2015;11(4):309-315 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  33. Koch A, Zink S, Singer H. B-type natriuretic peptide in paediatric patients with congenital heart disease. Eur Heart J 2006;27(7):861-866 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  34. Singampalli KL, Jui E, Shani K, Ning Y, Connell JP, Birla RK, et al. Congenital Heart Disease: An Immunological Perspective. Front Cardiovasc Med 2021;8:701375 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  35. Cao L, Du Y, Zhang M, Wang F, Zhao JY, Ren YY, et al. High maternal blood lipid levels during early pregnancy are associated with increased risk of congenital heart disease in offspring. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2021;100(10):1806-1813 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  36. Iacobescu L, Ciobanu AO, Corlatescu AD, Simionescu M, Iacobescu GL, Dragomir E, et al. The Role of Circulating MicroRNAs in Cardiovascular Diseases: A Novel Biomarker for Diagnosis and Potential Therapeutic Targets?. Cureus 2024;16(7):e64100 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  37. Rajpal S, Alshawabkeh L, Opotowsky AR. Current Role of Blood and Urine Biomarkers in the Clinical Care of Adults with Congenital Heart Disease. Curr Cardiol Rep 2017;19(6):50 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  38. Lucero García Rojas EY, Villanueva C, Bond RA. Hypoxia Inducible Factors as Central Players in the Pathogenesis and Pathophysiology of Cardiovascular Diseases. Front Cardiovasc Med 2021;8:709509 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  39. Zhao Y, Xiong W, Li C, Zhao R, Lu H, Song S, et al. Hypoxia-induced signaling in the cardiovascular system: pathogenesis and therapeutic targets. Signal Transduct Target Ther 2023;8(1):431 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  40. Yin HL, Luo CW, Dai ZK, Shaw KP, Chai CY, Wu CC. Hypoxia-inducible factor-1α, vascular endothelial growth factor, inducible nitric oxide synthase, and endothelin-1 expression correlates with angiogenesis in congenital heart disease. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2016;32(7):348-355 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  41. Zheng B, Fu J. Oxidative stress in pediatric diseases associated with the origin of life and growth and development. Front Cell Dev Biol 2025;13:1550765 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  42. Song N, Ma J, Meng XW, Liu H, Wang H, Song SY, et al. Heat Shock Protein 70 Protects the Heart from Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury through Inhibition of p38 MAPK Signaling. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2020;2020:3908641 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  43. Nelson KM, Irvin-Choy N, Hoffman MK, Gleghorn JP, Day ES. Diseases and conditions that impact maternal and fetal health and the potential for nanomedicine therapies. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2021;170:425-438 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  44. Nair M, Drakesmith CW, Smith M, Bankhead CR, Sparrow DB. Maternal Anaemia and Congenital Heart Disease in Offspring: A Case-Control Study Using Linked Electronic Health Records in the United Kingdom. BJOG 2025;132(8):1139-1146 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  45. Bahado-Singh RO, Ertl R, Mandal R, Bjorndahl TC, Syngelaki A, Han B, et al. Metabolomic prediction of fetal congenital heart defect in the first trimester. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014;211(3):240.e1-240.e14 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  46. Friedman P, Yilmaz A, zafer U, Jafar F, Whitten A, Turkoglu O, et al. Maternal urine metabolomics and the prediction of fetal non-syndromic congenital heart defect (CHD). Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020;222(1 Suppl):S79 View Article
  47. Kumaran K, Yajnik P, Lubree H, Joglekar C, Bhat D, Katre P, et al. The Pune Rural Intervention in Young Adolescents (PRIYA) study: design and methods of a randomised controlled trial. BMC Nutr 2017;3:41 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  48. Shawky RM, Ramy ARM, El-din SMN, Abd SM, Abd MA. Abnormal maternal biomarkers of homocysteine and methionine metabolism and the risk of congenital heart defects. Egypt J Med Hum Genet 2018;19(1):7-12 View Article
  49. Singampalli KL, Jui E, Shani K, Ning Y, Connell JP, Birla RK, et al. Congenital Heart Disease: An Immunological Perspective. Front Cardiovasc Med 2021;8:701375 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  50. Ramakrishnan S, Kukreti BB, Ramakrishnan L, Salahuddin S, Pendharkar A, Karthikeyan G, et al. Inflammatory markers are elevated in Eisenmenger syndrome. Pediatr Cardiol 2013;34(8):1791-1796 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  51. Huang L, Li L, Hu E, Chen G, Meng X, Xiong C, et al. Potential biomarkers and targets in reversibility of pulmonary arterial hypertension secondary to congenital heart disease: an explorative study. Pulm Circ 2018;8(2):2045893218755987 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  52. Bassareo PP, McMahon CJ. Metabolomics: A New Tool in Our Understanding of Congenital Heart Disease. Children (Basel) 2022;9(12):1803 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  53. Diab NS, Barish S, Dong W, Zhao S, Allington G, Yu X, et al. Molecular Genetics and Complex Inheritance of Congenital Heart Disease. Genes (Basel) 2021;12(7):1020 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  54. Homsy J, Zaidi S, Shen Y, Ware JS, Samocha KE, Karczewski KJ, et al. De novo mutations in congenital heart disease with neurodevelopmental and other congenital anomalies. Science 2015;350(6265):1262-1266 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  55. Sevim Bayrak C, Zhang P, Tristani-Firouzi M, Gelb BD, Itan Y. De novo variants in exomes of congenital heart disease patients identify risk genes and pathways. Genome Med 2020;12(1):9 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  56. Zaidi S, Choi M, Wakimoto H, Ma L, Jiang J, Overton JD, et al. De novo mutations in histone-modifying genes in congenital heart disease. Nature 2013;498(7453):220-223 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  57. Ciancarella P, Ciliberti P, Santangelo TP, Secchi F, Stagnaro N, Secinaro A. Noninvasive imaging of congenital cardiovascular defects. Radiol Med 2020;125(11):1167-1185 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  58. Zhang YF, Zeng XL, Zhao EF, Lu HW. Diagnostic Value of Fetal Echocardiography for Congenital Heart Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015;94(42):e1759 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  59. Mozumdar N, Rowland J, Pan S, Rajagopal H, Geiger MK, Srivastava S, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Fetal Echocardiography in Congenital Heart Disease. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2020;33(11):1384-1390 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  60. Rodríguez-Pérez JM, Ortega-Zhindón DB, Villamil-Castañeda C, Lara-Ortiz JS, Borgonio-Cuadra VM, Cervantes-Salazar JL, et al. Congenital Heart Diseases: Recent Insights into Epigenetic Mechanisms. Cells 2025;14(11):820 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  61. Hanna A, Frangogiannis NG. Inflammatory Cytokines and Chemokines as Therapeutic Targets in Heart Failure. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 2020;34(6):849-863 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  62. Patric B, Camille A, Mauro I, Hammerer-Lercher A, Breidthardt T, Müller C, et al. Soluble ST2-A New Biomarker in Heart Failure. Cardiovasc Med 2019;22(1):w02008 View Article
  63. Fernandes BA, Maher KO, Deshpande SR. Cardiac biomarkers in pediatric heart disease: A state of art review. World J Cardiol 2016;8(12):719-727 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  64. Zrinski Topic R, Lenicek Krleza J. Cardiac Markers in Pediatric Laboratory Medicine: Critical Review. Diagnostics (Basel) 2025;15(2):165 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  65. Fang H, Fang GH, Chen DJ, Chang HJ, Yang MH, Zhang H, et al. The association of environmental toxicants exposure with cardiovascular disease risk: A comprehensive analysis from population to molecular mechanism. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 2026;309:119562 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  66. Wang Y, Cao L, Liang D, Meng L, Wu Y, Qiao F, et al. Prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis in fetuses with congenital heart disease: a prospective cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018;218(2):244.e1-244.e17 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  67. Wang L, Tian D, Hu J, Xing H, Sun M, Wang J, et al. MiRNA-145 Regulates the Development of Congenital Heart Disease Through Targeting FXN. Pediatr Cardiol 2016;37(4):629-636 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  68. Zhu S, Cao L, Zhu J, Kong L, Jin J, Qian L, et al. Identification of maternal serum microRNAs as novel non-invasive biomarkers for prenatal detection of fetal congenital heart defects. Clin Chim Acta 2013;424:66-72 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  69. Wang C, Xie L, Zhou K, Zhan Y, Li Y, Li H, et al. Increased risk for congenital heart defects in children carrying the ABCB1 Gene C3435T polymorphism and maternal periconceptional toxicants exposure. PLoS One 2013;8(7):e68807 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  70. Patel J, Bircan E, Tang X, Orloff M, Hobbs CA, Browne ML, et al. Paternal genetic variants and risk of obstructive heart defects: A parent-of-origin approach. PLoS Genet 2021;17(3):e1009413 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  71. Li Y, Sun Y, Yang L, Huang M, Zhang X, Wang X, et al. Analysis of Biomarkers for Congenital Heart Disease Based on Maternal Amniotic Fluid Metabolomics. Front Cardiovasc Med 2021;8:671191 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  72. Yang J, Chang Q, Dang S, Liu X, Zeng L, Yan H. Dietary Quality during Pregnancy and Congenital Heart Defects. Nutrients 2022;14(17):3654 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  73. Smedts HP, van Uitert EM, Valkenburg O, Laven JS, Eijkemans MJ, Lindemans J, et al. A derangement of the maternal lipid profile is associated with an elevated risk of congenital heart disease in the offspring. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 2012;22(6):477-485 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  74. Ohuchi H, Negishi J, Hayama Y, Sasaki O, Taniguchi Y, Noritake K, et al. Hyperuricemia reflects global Fontan pathophysiology and associates with morbidity and mortality in patients after the Fontan operation. Int J Cardiol 2015;184:623-630 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  75. Correia GD, Wooi Ng K, Wijeyesekera A, Gala-Peralta S, Williams R, MacCarthy-Morrogh S, et al. Metabolic Profiling of Children Undergoing Surgery for Congenital Heart Disease. Crit Care Med 2015;43(7):1467-1476 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  76. Oguz MM, Oguz AD, Sanli C, Cevik A. Serum levels of soluble ICAM-1 in children with pulmonary artery hypertension. Tex Heart Inst J 2014;41(2):159-164 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  77. Nassef YE, Hamed MA, Aly HF. Inflammatory cytokines, apoptotic, tissue injury and remodeling biomarkers in children with congenital heart disease. Indian J Clin Biochem 2014;29(2):145-149 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  78. Clausen H, Norén E, Valtonen S, Koivu A, Sairanen M, Liuba P. Evaluation of Circulating Cardiovascular Biomarker Levels for Early Detection of Congenital Heart Disease in Newborns in Sweden. JAMA Netw Open 2020;3(12):e2027561 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  79. Sugimoto M, Masutani S, Seki M, Kajino H, Fujieda K, Senzaki H. High serum levels of procollagen type III N-terminal amino peptide in patients with congenital heart disease. Heart 2009;95(24):2023-2028 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  80. Tomar M. Echo in Congenital Heart Disease. J Indian Acad Echocardiogr Cardiovasc Imaging 2020;4(3):243 View Article
  81. Dacher JN, Barre E, Durand I, Hazelzet T, Brasseur-Daudruy M, Blondiaux É, et al. CT and MR imaging in congenital cardiac malformations: Where do we come from and where are we going?. Diagn Interv Imaging 2016;97(5):505-512 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  82. Harold JG. Cardiology patient page. Screening for critical congenital heart disease in newborns. Circulation 2014;130(9):e79-e81 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  83. Zhang R, Gong J, Wang S, Shen L, Xie Y, Li X. Relationship Between Serum B7-H3 Levels and Prognosis of Congenital Heart Disease in Children. Pediatr Cardiol 2019;40(1):177-181 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  84. Blok IM, van Riel AC, Schuuring MJ, de Bruin-Bon RH, van Dijk AP, Hoendermis ES, et al. The role of cystatin C as a biomarker for prognosis in pulmonary arterial hypertension due to congenital heart disease. Int J Cardiol 2016;209:242-247 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  85. Valverde I, Paolino A, Serrano Gotarredona MP, Navarro S, Romero N, Fernandez-Cruz J. NT-proBNP as a biomarker of right ventricular dilatation and pulmonary regurgitation in Tetralogy of Fallot. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2015;17(Suppl 1):Q100 View Article
  86. Sun L, Sun S, Li Y, Pan W, Xie Y, Wang S, et al. Potential biomarkers predicting risk of pulmonary hypertension in congenital heart disease: the role of homocysteine and hydrogen sulfide. Chin Med J (Engl) 2014;127(5):893-899 PubMed/NCBI
  87. Goetze JP, Bruneau BG, Ramos HR, Ogawa T, de Bold MK, de Bold AJ. Cardiac natriuretic peptides. Nat Rev Cardiol 2020;17(11):698-717 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  88. Quek S, Zill-E-Huma R, Andrews M, Mouyis M. Usefulness of brain-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels in pregnancy. Obstet Med 2025 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  89. Yao S, Yang T, Kong X, Dang Y, Chen P, Lyu M. The Influence of Maternal Condition on Fetal Cardiac Function during the Second Trimester. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023;13(17):2755 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  90. Finkelstein JL, Fothergill A, Johnson CB, Guetterman HM, Bose B, Jabbar S, et al. Anemia and Vitamin B-12 and Folate Status in Women of Reproductive Age in Southern India: Estimating Population-Based Risk of Neural Tube Defects. Curr Dev Nutr 2021;5(5):nzab069 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  91. Gonnella F, Konstantinidou F, Di Berardino C, Capacchietti G, Peserico A, Russo V, et al. A Systematic Review of the Effects of High-Fat Diet Exposure on Oocyte and Follicular Quality: A Molecular Point of View. Int J Mol Sci 2022;23(16):8890 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  92. Sugishita Y, Watanabe M, Fisher SA. Role of myocardial hypoxia in the remodeling of the embryonic avian cardiac outflow tract. Dev Biol 2004;267(2):294-308 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  93. Kodo K, Uchida K, Yamagishi H. Genetic and Cellular Interaction During Cardiovascular Development Implicated in Congenital Heart Diseases. Front Cardiovasc Med 2021;8:653244 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  94. Wagner N, Wagner KD. Molecular Mechanisms of Cardiac Development and Disease. Int J Mol Sci 2023;24(10):8784 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  95. Sun HY. Prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart defects: echocardiography. Transl Pediatr 2021;10(8):2210-2224 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  96. Jindal A, Sharma M, Karena ZV, Chaudhary C. Amniocentesis. StatPearls 2025; Treasure Island (FL) : StatPearls Publishing. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK559247/
  97. Netala VR, Teertam SK, Li H, Zhang Z. A Comprehensive Review of Cardiovascular Disease Management: Cardiac Biomarkers, Imaging Modalities, Pharmacotherapy, Surgical Interventions, and Herbal Remedies. Cells 2024;13(17):1471 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  98. Zhou S, Liu L, Jin X, Dorikun D, Ma S. Biomarkers predicting postoperative adverse outcomes in children with congenital heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Pediatr 2025;13:1508329 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  99. Făgărășan A, Săsăran M, Gozar L, Crauciuc A, Bănescu C. The Role of Galectin-3 in Predicting Congenital Heart Disease Outcome: A Review of the Literature. Int J Mol Sci 2023;24(13):10511 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  100. Parker DM, Everett AD, Stabler ME, Vricella L, Jacobs ML, Jacobs JP, et al. Novel Biomarkers Improve Prediction of 365-Day Readmission After Pediatric Congenital Heart Surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2020;109(1):164-170 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  • Nature Cell and Science
  • 2958-695X

Biomarkers in Congenital Heart Disease: Current Evidence and Future Directions

Shadab Ahamad
  • Reset Zoom
  • Download TIFF